UN
uniQure N.V. (QURE)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue was $1.57M, down sharply year-over-year due to lower collaboration and the shift of HEMGENIX contract manufacturing to “other expenses” post-Lexington divestiture; revenue materially missed Wall Street consensus of ~$6.39M. EPS of -$0.82 was better than the -$1.01 consensus, aided by lower R&D/SG&A and a $6.0M one-time reagent gain; net loss improved to -$43.6M from -$65.6M YoY . Revenue consensus and EPS consensus values marked with an asterisk are from S&P Global.*
- The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to AMT-130 in April, and management held Type B FDA meetings on CMC and the statistical analysis plan; a regulatory update (including BLA timing) is expected after receipt of formal minutes in Q2 2025 .
- Initial safety data for the third AMT-130 cohort (with prophylactic immunosuppression) showed no treatment‑related SAEs; management favors a short, 2‑week steroid regimen going forward, with pivotal data from the Phase I/II program expected in Q3 2025 (3‑year follow-up on 24 treated patients) .
- Cash, cash equivalents and investment securities were $409.0M at March 31, 2025; management reiterated runway into 2H 2027. A follow-on equity offering added ~$80.5M net in Q1, supporting BLA readiness and commercialization preparations for AMT‑130 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation for AMT-130, reinforcing the accelerated pathway alignment and clinical promise. “Breakthrough Therapy designation…underscores the FDA’s continued engagement with AMT‑130” (CEO) .
- Cohort 3 immunosuppression learnings: AMT‑130 generally well-tolerated; no treatment-related SAEs; management proposes optimized perioperative steroids only. “We believe a short 2‑week course of steroids represents an appropriate…strategy” (CMO) .
- Balance sheet strengthened: $409.0M cash and investments, runway into 2H 2027, and $80.5M net proceeds from Q1 follow-on; reduced expense structure after Lexington sale and restructuring .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue fell to $1.6M vs $8.5M YoY on lower collaboration and the reclassification of contract manufacturing (post-Lexington sale) to “other expenses,” driving a significant top-line miss vs consensus (~$6.39M). Collaboration revenue -$3.3M YoY; contract manufacturing -$4.0M YoY .
- Dependence on non-operating items: $8.3M other income driven by a one-time $6.0M reagent sale; ongoing amortization of the Genezen favorable purchase right lifted “other expense” to $2.0M .
- Continued royalty financing and debt load: liability from royalty financing rose to $446.7M; long-term debt ~$51.6M at March 31, 2025, remaining a structural headwind as the company advances BLA and commercialization .
Financial Results
Quarterly trend (oldest → newest)
Values with an asterisk are from S&P Global.*
Q1 2025 vs prior year and estimates
Values with an asterisk are from S&P Global.*
Operating KPIs (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
Liquidity
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The FDA granted breakthrough therapy designation…we look forward to providing a detailed regulatory update later this quarter after we receive formal meeting minutes.” (CEO) .
- “AMT‑130 continues to be generally well tolerated at both doses with no treatment‑related serious adverse events…a short 2‑week course of steroids represents an appropriate…strategy.” (CMO) .
- “Cash…totaled $409 million…This strong balance sheet provides uniQure with the resources…including the planned U.S. launch of AMT‑130. We expect…sufficient to fund operations into the second half of 2027.” (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Regulatory continuity under new CBER leadership: management emphasized reliance on 3+ years of clinical outcomes (not surrogate biomarkers) and confidence in their dataset .
- Statistical analysis plan and external control: primary 3‑year analysis with propensity methods; comparator finalized with FDA; top-line Q3 data aligned to SAP .
- Immunosuppression protocol: triple regimen observed 3 SAEs related to immunosuppression (mania, infection, fever), all resolved; moving to short steroid course .
- CMC timeline: leveraging HEMGENIX experience and same site/personnel; further details to be provided in Q2 regulatory update .
- Commercial rollout capacity: >50 US sites could administer MRI‑guided intracranial therapy; focus on early-manifest HD patients initially .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Revenue $1.567M vs consensus ~$6.389M (miss); EPS -$0.82 vs consensus -$1.01 (beat). Ten estimates for both revenue and EPS.* Actuals per press release .
- Q4 2024: Revenue ~$5.221M vs consensus ~$19.097M (miss); EPS -$1.49 vs consensus -$0.54 (miss). Eleven revenue and eight EPS estimates.*
Values marked with an asterisk are from S&P Global.
Values with an asterisk are from S&P Global.*
Implications: Street models likely need to lower near-term revenue and adjust opex/other income assumptions; EPS resilience this quarter (vs consensus) tied to one-time gains and lower operating expenses .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term catalyst stack: Q2 2025 regulatory update (BLA timing) and Q3 2025 clinical update (3‑year follow-up on 24 treated AMT‑130 patients) should drive narrative and potential re-rating .
- The quarter’s top-line shortfall was known structural (collaboration and HEMGENIX manufacturing reclassification) rather than a pipeline setback; monitor future collaboration/licensing inflows .
- EPS beat vs consensus was quality-mixed (lower opex plus $6.0M one-time reagent sale); durability hinges on opex discipline and non-operating headwinds (royalty financing) .
- Immunosuppression optimization reduces procedural risk; focus shifts to durability and magnitude of cUHDRS benefit at 3 years—key to accelerated approval case .
- Liquidity is ample ($409.0M; runway into 2H 2027), enabling BLA and commercial build-out; follow-on offering de‑risked capital needs near term .
- Commercial readiness: >50 centers capable of MRI-guided administration; potential first-in-class, best‑in‑class positioning in a large genetic patient pool may attract partners/ex‑US strategies .
- Trading lens: stock sensitivity to Q2 regulatory clarity and Q3 clinical data is high; downside protection depends on perceived CMC readiness and consistency of 3‑year cUHDRS effect vs external control .
Notes:
- Values marked with an asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global.